Webinar Recording – Accuracy Case Study: Panels vs. SurveyWalls

Accuracy Case Study: Panels vs. SurveyWalls

Thank you to the attendees to our 8/16/18 Greenbook Webinar, “Accuracy Case Study: Panels vs SurveyWalls”. We hope you enjoyed it. Couldn’t attend? You can access the slides and the recording here. Please feel free to pass these along to colleagues who may be interested.

We hope you can join us at a future Survata Webinar!

Interested in learning more about how Survata’s Publisher Networks yields higher response quality over in-person panels? Send us a note.

Webinar – Accuracy Case Study: Panels vs. SurveyWalls


Join us on Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 2 pm ET to find out if monetary incentives of panels could lead to bad data.

Survata will reveal the results of two market research studies (1 CPG, 1 Apparel) collected across both a panel and a SurveyWall to see which method offers better accuracy. Digital publishers want to monetize their content, and a simple SurveyWall can easily replace a paywall and allow consumers to access the premium content they desire by answering survey questions. Unlike traditional panels where survey respondents are compensated, a SurveyWall is a cashless transaction that can benefit the researcher, the survey respondent, and the digital publisher.

Register today to:

-Understand the difference between an in-person panel and online SurveyWalls
-Review the results of a study to see which method yields better accuracy
-Understand how different incentive systems can affect data quality

We will answer these questions:

-How do SurveyWalls differ from other offer walls?
-Can you determine feasibility of sample from a SurveyWalls vs. panel?

Save your seat >>